#BookReview: The Mulai by Munir Hachemi translated by Julia Sanches

#BookReview: The Mulai by Munir Hachemi translated by Julia SanchesThe Mulai by Munir Hachemi
Translator: Julia Sanches
Format: eARC
Source: supplied by publisher via Edelweiss
Formats available: paperback, ebook, audiobook
Genres: colonialism and colonization, literary fiction, science fiction, speculative fiction
Pages: 176
Published by Coach House Books on July 14, 2026
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazonBarnes & NobleBookshop.orgBetter World Books
Goodreads

Interstellar via Invisible Cities: spec-fic translated from Spanish imagines a utopian way of life on another planet.
Years after the climate wars on Earth, the Mulai have settled into their new home on an unnamed planet. Supplies stopped arriving from Earth many years ago, and the Mulai have found a way to live. But now the people of Earth want to know what happened to the settlers, so they send The Archaeologist.
He finds that they have become a different people: uncannily similar to us but with something radically Other about them. Their language has become more about change than stability, and the ways they eat, reproduce, bury their dead, and understand gender have all transformed into something almost unrecognizable. The Archaeologist feels like his trip is one extended misunderstanding.
With fragments from The Archaeologist’s notes and the stories of Flukeh and Faida, who map both their world and their language, The Mulai offers a glimpse of a world adjacent to ours – one that just may be a model for how to better our own.
From one of Granta’s Best Young Spanish-Language Novelists and author of the celebrated Living Things, and translated by the award-winning Julia Sanches, comes a bold new Borgesian reimagining of what ‘civilization’ might look like.

My Review:

“It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so” – according to Mark Twain. The saying is a longer version of the old saw about “assume” making an “ass” out of “u” and “me”.

It’s the same idea at the heart, the idea that what we “think we know”, what we’ve already decided, what we “assume” is what gets us in trouble, because we’re so certain of our certainties that we don’t see that those certainties are certainly incorrect no matter how much that incorrectness does its damndest to beat us over the head with a clue-by-four.

The overall story in The Mulai is SFnal. It’s even been done before – although not like this. That basic SFnal story is about colonization – and about the drift that occurs between the new colony and the original place from which it sprang. Which, come to think of it, is the story of colonization and colonialism on this planet throughout history, as the colonies, because of their physical separation from the “mother country” and their entirely different geography and climate and conditions, drifted away from the place which seeded them – and later suppressed them – in the first place.

I digress – but not all that far.

In the SFnal version of that real-world phenomenon, the separation between the colony and its originator can be absolute in a way that it isn’t on a single planet. The colony ship that settled the remote planet in this story – and the Earth from which it sprang – were separated by vast distance and by Earth, well, getting stuck in its own troubles and losing track of its colonies. And then coming back to study where their colony has drifted away from them and, possibly, seeing what they can do about that in ways that may be benign (emphasis on MAY) – at least at the outset.

Although the fact that the visitors to the Mulai from Earth are studying the people like an archeological/anthropological project is not a good sign. Not even when one of their number “goes native” with all of the terrible implications that phrase has to offer.

The story here is told from multiple perspectives. One is that of the visiting “archaeologist” who starts out judgmental and stuck in his own perspectives, but over the decades comes to realize that whatever assumptions he started out with are completely wrong.

But there are other points of view – from the Mulai themselves. Ironically, they’re not all that different from the Archaeologist’s, because they are also stories of how people react to radical change. The apple of the Mulai may not have fallen as far from the tree of humanity – at least as far as behavior goes – as it seems at first.

Which doesn’t mean that either their use of language – which this story focuses on – or the way that they see THEIR world – aren’t radically different from that of the people from which they sprang. Because they absolutely are. That the archaeologists and especially the anthropologists back home are still trying to shoehorn the square peg of the Mulai into the round hole of their academic assumptions is every bit as human as their collective reaction to having their assumptions challenged in the first place.

Escape Rating B: The Mulai is part of the literary science fiction tradition, and that’s clear from the books that it includes within its discussion of language and in the stories it compares itself to as seen through the eyes of the visiting scientists. The story is liberally sprinkled with quotes from Jorge Luis Borges, Italo Calvino – particularly his Invisible Cities, and Ursula K. LeGuin and her Hugo and Nebula Award winning The Dispossessed.

Not that the whole “lost colony rediscovered” story hasn’t been also told in the most popular of SF stories, including Anne McCaffrey’s Pern series and the Arcane Society/Harmony series by the multiply pseudonymous Jayne Ann Krentz. It’s a concept that can be pulled into multiple directions easily because it offers so much scope for things going very wrong.

But the way the story is told in The Mulai makes it a story about language and communication – and about how differing styles of communication set assumptions on both sides onto their pointy little heads. Because we – and the Archaeologist represents us and the way our world works – assume that writing stabilizes a language. That once things start getting written down, the narrative starts settling down into a single track and interpretation. (I’m simplifying and my interpretation is as subject to error as theirs are). The Mulai see writing differently. From their perspective, writing is a form of play where words and stories change and are changed by the entire community and continue to do so.

So the Archaeologist is trying to create a chronology and the Mulai are changing the ‘historical’ scenarios right out from under him. And the whole story is like that in that his – meaning our – interpretations of the Mulai’s actions, language and culture are radically different from their own. Neither of them are either right or wrong at the outset, but that doesn’t mean that the relationship couldn’t go wrong with the application of superior firepower.

But the story doesn’t go there – at least as far as we know at the end. Leaving the reader with a great deal to ponder.

In fact, I was still pondering as I walked away from writing this review, and came back to mention one final note. This is a story about the assumptions, errors and pitfalls of communication between people who do not share a frame of reference – even if the Archeologist and his people start out thinking that they do. Crossing that divide – not in words but in meaning – is every bit as difficult and prone to error as it is in the Star Trek Next Gen episode “Darmok”, Edward Ashton’s The Fourth Consort, and Ray Nayler’s The Mountain in the Sea, and in the end also just as fascinating.

If you’re pondering giving this story a read after this review – and I hope you are – you might want to take a look at an entirely different but extremely interesting take over at Ancillary Review of Books.

A- #BookReview: Foundling Fathers by Meg Elison

A- #BookReview: Foundling Fathers by Meg ElisonFoundling Fathers by Meg Elison
Format: eARC
Source: supplied by publisher via Edelweiss
Formats available: paperback, ebook
Genres: politics, satire, science fiction, speculative fiction
Pages: 192
Published by Tachyon Publications on June 23, 2026
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazonBarnes & NobleKoboBookshop.orgBetter World Books
Goodreads

When a radical think tank clones America’s founding fathers, The Boys from Brazil meets the bicentennial in this ingeniously satirical mashup of U.S. history, cloning, and technocracy gone terribly wrong.
The trouble starts when a curious teenager, Benjamin, finds an iPhone in his privy. The problem is, it’s supposed to be 1750.
Ben takes his discovery to his brothers—Thomas, John, and George. The boys have been raised in isolation on an island plantation by a firm but kind woman, Mary Libertas. All four of them chafe at Mary’s restrictions upon them—especially Thomas, who has impregnated yet another servant.
Meanwhile, their de facto father figure, Jeff Hancock, complains to the shadowy Antediluvian Society that it is past the time to explain to the boys where they come from and what they must do: Run America the way it used to be run.
In this more-than-slightly-absurdist novella, Philip K. Dick Award–winning author Meg Elison (Find Layla) skewers those looking to an idyllic past to solve the problems they continue to create.

My Review:

I picked this up on the Fourth of July, because it looked like it would be the perfect read for this mixed-feelings semiquincentennial birthday of the United States AND because that cover was so intriguing I couldn’t resist.

And it was perfect for this particular weekend. Not because of its SFnal premise – which has been done before – but for what it says about the U.S. at this particular point in time. And that it says it with dry wit and dark humor and more than a bit of satirical poking at our beliefs in American exceptionalism and the current state of affairs in these (not so) United States.

The premise is both utterly SF and completely bonkers. (And a whole lot closer to being plausible than Ira Levin’s The Boys from Brazil). Between the now everyday occurrence of IVF and artificial insemination, and the not too far distant possibilities of human cloning, the idea of recreating the “Fab Four” of the American Revolution – Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams – isn’t nearly as far-fetched as it was when Levin’s book was published in 1976. (Ironically, now, the year of the US bicentennial.)

However, human cloning isn’t nearly as simple as cloning a plant or even a mouse. Which is where this book gets interesting. Because it’s not about the tech. It’s about the people. And people are not just collections of cells, they’re collections of memory and experience. Things that are a LOT harder to replicate.

Because time marches on.

So the idea of a group of über wealthy men hiding their desire to clone themselves and live forever behind a project to clone the “Founding Fathers” of the country in order to recreate a political system they believe will favor “their kind of people” and that they are certain they will be able to control isn’t beyond the realms of possibility. In fact, it’s that possibility that makes the story work – particularly as the plan falls apart.

That plan hinges on four men who were leaders – and who are raised to BE leaders. Except in complete isolation from the 21st century world in the hopes of re-creating the men they used to be in a world that is not the one that created their originals.

They’re not supposed to eat from the “Tree of Knowledge” of where the world is now until they’re ready to be led by their noses to lead everyone else. But as Robert Burns famously penned in 1785, a quote with which Franklin, Washington, Jefferson and Adams would have been all too familiar, “The best-laid schemes of mice and men go oft awry.”

All because Benjamin Franklin discovered the wonders of the smartphone ahead of his time. Of course it was Franklin. Who else would it have been?

Escape Rating A-: I absolutely DID pick this book up for the cover. The story is a LOT deeper and more thought provoking that that cover implies, but that cover, and the opening scene, were more than intriguing enough to pull the reader in. Once I was in, I was hooked.

The idea behind the story is both very SFnal AND completely rooted in today at the same time. It’s doing what SF does best – taking a look at present conditions while providing just enough of a “fig leaf” to let the reader step outside the real world while looking at, well, the real world. There are messages if you look for them, but if a reader doesn’t want to look, the story is more than enough to carry them past those points. (Even if they shouldn’t let themselves be carried past – IMHO.)

The cloning part of this story has been done before in one fashion or another. Levin’s The Boys from Brazil cloned Hitler. Multiple times. Problems ensued. Jurassic Park is about the de-extinction of dinosaurs through cloning. But the concept has also been treated more thoughtfully, and more on point for this story, in both The Tusks of Extinction by Ray Nayler, about an attempt at de-extinctioning the woolly mammoth, and more recently and much closer to the issues of Foundling Fathers, in Cameron Reed’s Hugo-nominated novelette, The Girl That My Mother is Leaving Me For.

Because this story isn’t about the process of cloning or even the process of raising and educating those “foundling fathers”. It’s about the way the scheme falls apart and what happens in the aftermath.

Just because the boys have the same genetics as their progenitors, that does not mean they’re going to turn out the same as their originals, because it’s impossible to fully recreate the experiences that made them who they were. Even the isolation that keeps them from learning the “truth” of the 21st century is a factor. They may not know the present but as they reach adulthood they know they do not possess the liberty they have been taught to cherish.

(This is the part of the story that most aligns with Cameron Reed’s story, in that it is possible to recreate some of the conditions that made the original person so singular, but the world and its changes mean that it can’t REALLY be done.)

When the scheme to “recreate” these giants of American history collapses and is exposed, they see the world as it really is – and that it is NOT the world they were prepared for. And the way that works out, both for the Antediluvian Society (yes, really) that funded the project and for the young men themselves is all about the way that the world currently operates, both for them and for us.

Looking back at the past will not move us forward, both because the past is another country and because the past is gone. It’s what we do in the present to make the future that matters. No matter how much some might wish to return to a past that they believe is more glorious – or more favorable – or more controllable – or more in keeping with their own antediluvian prejudices.

Foundling Fathers turned out to be a surprising and perfect read for this Independence Day. The characters of those “Founding Fathers” managed to portray these towering figures as young men who are less than larger than life yet still reflect the characteristics we remember them for – even as their personalities were extended into a world the originals never imagined. The story is both witty and biting – and it bites in exactly the places and people it should in this fascinating and fantastic story.

#BookReview: We Will Rise Again edited by Karen Lord, Annalee Newitz and Malka Older

#BookReview: We Will Rise Again edited by Karen Lord, Annalee Newitz and Malka OlderWe Will Rise Again: Speculative Stories and Essays on Protest, Resistance, and Hope by Karen Lord, Annalee Newitz, Malka Ann Older
Format: eARC
Source: supplied by publisher via Edelweiss
Formats available: paperback, ebook, audiobook
Genres: activism, anthologies, essays, fantasy, hopepunk, politics, science fiction, short stories, social justice, speculative fiction
Pages: 384
Published by S&S/Saga Press on December 2, 2025
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazonBarnes & NobleKoboBookshop.orgBetter World Books
Goodreads

From genre luminaries, esteemed organizers, and exciting new voices in fiction, an anthology of stories, essays, and interviews that offer transformative visions of the future, fantastical alternate worlds, and inspiration for the social justice movements of tomorrow.

In this collection, editors Karen Lord, Annalee Newitz, and Malka Older champion realistic, progressive social change using the speculative stories of writers across the world. Exploring topics ranging from disability justice and environmental activism to community care and collective worldbuilding, these imaginative pieces from writers such as NK Jemisin, Charlie Jane Anders, Alejandro Heredia, Sam J. Miller, Nisi Shawl, and Sabrina Vourvoulias center solidarity, empathy, hope, joy, and creativity.

Each story is grounded within a broader sociopolitical framework using essays and interviews from movement leaders, including adrienne maree brown and Walidah Imarisha, charting the future history of protest, revolutions, and resistance with the same zeal for accuracy that speculative writers normally bring to science and technology. Using the vehicle of ambitious storytelling, We Will Rise Again offers effective tools for organizing, an unflinching interrogation of the status quo, and a blueprint for prefiguring a different world.

My Review:

This fascinating collection, edited by Karen Lord, Annalee Newitz and Malka Older, does something that isn’t done often – or perhaps just not often enough. Because it deals with real world issues explicitly through speculative fiction, it deliberately puts the included stories in dialogue with essays by and interviews with thinkers and especially doers who have experience with the problems raised and carried into the speculative realm.

This collection is also an homage and a continuation of the book Octavia’s Brood, edited by adrienne maree brown and Walidah Imarisha in 2015. It is both right and fitting that interviews with brown and Imarisha are part of the introduction to this current work.

My personal reading of this book focused on the included short stories which were written specifically for this collection, rather than the essays and interviews, many of which have been previously published elsewhere.

R.B. Lemberg – “Other Wars Elsewhere” c2025

This fantasy is a bit about the magic of places to pull at the heart, but is mostly about wars and refugee crises and people’s attention span for caring and giving to people and places that are not their own. It’s also a story about activism, both in the sense of doing it and in the sense of being caught up in the performance of it. And it’s also the story of a young woman learning that just because there’s a new crisis it doesn’t mean that an individual isn’t still emotionally attached to the old one and that sometimes you find your place to help and sometimes you come back to it. Mivka is a stand-in for Ukraine but that is far from all it is. Escape Rating A-

Rose Eveleth – “Originals Only” c2025
On the one hand this SF story has some fascinating things to say about athletes and how they’re viewed and lionized and cut down to size, how their lives are so wrapped up in their sport and prepping for it that they get tunnel vision, how little control they have over their lives and how they’re not prepared for their day in the sun to end – while also talking about how politics weaponizes people and talking points and whatever is top of mind to score off against marginalized groups and play identity politics. The problem with the story is that the protagonist is pretty much a cipher even at the ending. There’s no there there to wrap the story around – which may also be part of the point but leaves a void at the story’s center. Escape Rating B

Laia Asieo Odo – “Where Memory Meets the Sea” c2025

The story is about the erasure of memory and history, but makes it personal, poignant and downright heartbreaking by setting it in a world and specifically a country where individual memory erasure is possible and government sanctioned. The people have one day per year where they can remember and experience their losses, but even that is too much for a repressive government, leaving everyone with holes in their memories, injuries upon their bodies, and missing friends and family they’re not allowed to remember. Because if they did they’d overthrow them all. We know that history is written by the victors, and that counter-narratives to accepted truth get suppressed on the regular, but this puts the whole terrible thing and breaks the reader’s heart with grief and loss – even the ones that we don’t remember. Escape Rating A+

Samit Basu – “Disruption” c2025

This was interesting in that it’s not the first story I’ve read recently about weaponizing history erasure and using accepted truths to push a narrative. This one is a bit different because it also pulls in not just the evils of AI in general and the evils of AI in particular to do this work, but also the evils of letting AI control human behavior. It reminds me a bit of Where the Axe is Buried but is trying a bit too hard to be arch and the keystone doesn’t quite fit. Escape Rating B

Nisi Shawl – “The Gray and the Green” c2025

This one was weird – but that’s appropriate because the protagonist was totally weirded out. The story centers on a rather rapacious business owner who does an excellent job exploiting legal loopholes to make more money with fewer consequences. They start getting messages from their future self, attempting to set themselves on a better, more community-oriented but still highly profitable, path. It was a neat idea but didn’t quite work for me. Escape Rating B-

Sabrina Vourvoulias – “Perséfoni in the City” c2025

This story is about government corruption, community activism and the importance of food security, wrapped up in beautiful poetry and set in a world where food is a kind of magic in ways beyond the obvious. This was a story with a lot of irons in its fire, all of which were stories of their own. It would have worked better for me if it had picked a few of its storylines to follow through on – or if it had been long enough for all those crops to have had time to grow. And for a story intended for a speculative fiction collection, the speculative element was very slight. Escape Rating B

Jaymee Goh – “A Brief Letter on the Origins of the Harpy Aviary in the Kirani Citadel” c2025

This was fun, somewhat satirical and very pointed. Also feathered and clawed. It’s a story about sanctioned rebellions in a fantasy kingdom with a fascinating political structure where seemingly all marriages are polygamous in all directions, where children can inherit from anyone in the parental group – even the throne, and where outsiders coming in think that their quaint, backwards, “western” ways will hold sway over the Kirani’s very sensible arrangements for things. One pretender to the throne tries to bribe his way to the top, only to be overthrown by a mage who summons harpies to rout his illegal government. She’s in the right, but no good deed goes unpunished so she becomes the official heir AND is endlessly harangued by everyone who has to deal with the damage done by the harpies. The entire story is told in a letter to a friend, begging for at least a visit to help her get away from her onerous, necessary, but unwanted elevation to the crown. Escape Rating A-

Malka Older – “Aversion” c2025

At first, it seems like this story is about technology, kind of a reverse of subliminal advertising, where tech is used to show things people don’t want to see and generally turn their eyes away from. Things like horrific accidents, incidents of terrorism, war and peacetime atrocities. Then it pulls back a bit, and turns into a story about whether the ends of getting people to see the things that make them uncomfortable is worth the means of forcing them to do so. When that devolves into a debate about safety and security and protecting the children, it all sounds familiar but also necessary AND, more importantly, how easy it is to derail anything uncomfortable – if it pokes at the status quo. Then it pulls back again and it becomes a question about why people don’t see the truth of the world and how to get them to turn their attention back ON. This isn’t a fun story, but it is thought-provoking, particularly in that everyone is right but everyone is also very wrong. Escape Rating B+

Charlie Jane Anders – “Realer Than Real” c2025

This was fun, but it also made its point and hit it hard and well. At its heart, its a story that exposes the contradiction among conservatives that they want the US Constitution to be interpreted as the Founding Fathers would have seen it in the late 18th century. And at the same time they want it to enshrine the status quo as it is today – meaning that they want the law to enforce current ‘norms’ whatever those might be. The story takes that contradiction and pushes the envelope in both directions by poking directly at the way that some want to lock people down in their gender presentation based on how they look and how they dress and whether or not that conforms to ‘accepted’ interpretations of male and female. Because the clothing worn in the late 18th century – by the Founding Fathers and Mothers themselves – does not conform to 21st century standards AT ALL. And it doesn’t have to and neither should anyone today or any other day. Watching the drones all go spare and the Supreme Court judges get turned around was funny, but the point still got made and reinforced among the laughs. Escape Rating A+

Izzy Wasserstein – “The Rise and Fall of Storm Bluff, Kansas: An Oral History” c2025
This was an ultimately sad story about a failed anarchist revolution. The thing is that it should have worked, but the powers that be that preserve the status quo and stay in power by separating groups couldn’t tolerate the entirely legal and extremely cooperative purchase of all the land in a dying town in the middle of Kansas by a group of anarchists led by a transwoman, so they created a crisis so they could bring in troops and shut it all down. The story is told as a series of interviews with the survivors and its both fascinating and heartbreaking. A part of me wants to say that it wouldn’t happen like this because everything was done ‘right’ and legally, but reality says that it would. Dammit. Escape Rating A

Vida James – “Chupacabras” c2025

This is a story of frustration and rage – and it’s impossible not to feel both while reading. I think it hits even hard now than it did when it was written – or perhaps its that the theme feels realer and closer because it’s no longer just somewhere else but also here – albeit in a different way. The story is set in Puerto Rico, and it’s a story about hypergentrification, about the way the island is treated as a colony instead of a real part of the U.S., the way that the laws are written to favor the mainland instead of the citizens – or even just treating the citizens equally with other U.S. citizens. It’s about activism burnout, about how hard it is to keep fighting when the enemy owns all the battlefields for public awareness – and then it personalizes the whole fight into one woman, one monster and one very bloody possibility for extreme change. I can’t say I liked this story, exactly, but I absolutely did feel it. Escape Rating B

Alejandro Heredia – “If I Could Stay with You on Earth” c2025

This story was surprisingly sweet. It’s also a story where a non-violent protest is successful. And it’s a bit of a love story AND a love-letter to the Bronx at the same time. (And it made me want to go back and read The City We Became with its commentary on the personality of the five boroughs. It’s also a story about the power of an organized group to move the needle towards justice IF they have fair access to the lines of communication. It’s also, just a bit, about the impossibility of getting teenagers to hear the word “No”, but this time in a good way. It’s also a great story to shift the reader into a bit of a more hopeful space particularly after “Chupacabras”. Escape Rating A-

Annalee Newitz – “One of the Lesser-Known Revolutions” c2025

I’ve often said that I’m grateful to have grown up before digital footprints. Whatever mistakes I made – and they were as legion as anyone else’s – are not preserved and regurgitated over the internet. This story, in a way, reflects that era in that it’s about a group of students who want to go back to some of that, the idea that free speech isn’t an absolute right and that people who want to talk about murdering people and groups they hate have the right to say what they want but they don’t have the right to say it where they want. They can hate if they want, but they need to keep it private. Which is kind of the way it used to be before the megaphone of the internet existed. It’s a story about going back to enforcing the old stricture about not shouting fire in a crowded theater. While I loved the idea that it would keep haters from spamming and doxxing people they’ve decided to hate all over the internet, I can’t unsee the slippery slope this leads to. Escape Rating B

Kelly Robson – “Blockbuster” c2025

This managed to be both fun and sad at the same time, because it posits a world – or at least a tiny corner of it – where things are working as they could. And it’s wrapped around street burlesque in Toronto, which is inherently as fun as it is subversive. And it’s immersive, and the story is about one filmmaker who gets immersed and caught up in the possibilities of entertainment as a wedge to create social change even though the money backing his production pushes him towards cutting down the effort and preserving the status quo. The story is a lot bigger than all of this, and I liked what it was doing but didn’t care much for the protagonist or the cookie-cutter villain. Escape Rating B-

Abdulla Moaswes – “Kifaah and the Gospel” c2025

From one perspective, this is a story about AI as a tool of colonialism and the erasure of the cultures that colonialism wipes out in its rapaciousness. From another perspective, it resembles Nnedi Okorafor’s African futurism, even though this is not set in Africa, but rather the idea of the people who were once subjugated, returning to their land and making it their own, again. While, from a third perspective it reads as an attempt at cultural erasure that failed, as it centers around an artifact that, as much as it tells a terrible – and terribly slanted – story about cultural erasure in its historical past, becomes an object of error and derision when its programming forces it to assert that the present that is actually around it doesn’t exist. At the same time, the historical conflict that it references, the conflict that exists in our present between the Arabs and the Israelis in the Middle East is reduced to a simple binary that doesn’t sit right with this admittedly biased reader. I’m not sure I can rate this fairly because I can’t be remotely objective about it. But I’m still thinking about it, and that might be the most important part.

Overall Rating B+: Due to the collection’s mix of fiction and nonfiction, I can’t decide whether the rating should be “Escape” or “Reality”, particularly as even the fiction – or perhaps that’s especially the fiction, is real-world thought-provoking, as intended. However, speaking of the thoughts this collection evoked, I would highly recommend Cadwell Turnbull’s Convergence Saga, recently concluded with A Ruin, Great and Free, as a readalike for We Will Rise Again as his story brings so many of the concepts in this compelling collection to fantastic life.

A- #BookReview: This Great Hemisphere by Mateo Askaripour

A- #BookReview: This Great Hemisphere by Mateo AskaripourThis Great Hemisphere by Mateo Askaripour
Format: eARC
Source: supplied by publisher via Edelweiss
Formats available: hardcover, paperback, large print, ebook, audiobook
Genres: dystopian, science fiction, speculative fiction, political thriller
Pages: 432
Published by Dutton Books on July 9, 2024
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazonBarnes & NobleKoboBookshop.orgBetter World Books
Goodreads

From the award-winning and bestselling author of Black Buck : A speculative novel about a young woman—invisible by birth and relegated to second-class citizenship—who sets off on a mission to find her older brother, whom she had presumed dead but who is now the primary suspect in a high-profile political murder.
Despite the odds, Sweetmint, a young invisible woman, has done everything right her entire life—school, university, and now a highly sought-after apprenticeship with one of the Northwestern Hemisphere’s premier inventors, a non-invisible man belonging to the dominant population who is as eccentric as he is enigmatic. But the world she has fought so hard to build after the disappearance of her older brother comes crashing down when authorities claim that not only is he well and alive, he’s also the main suspect in the murder of the Chief Executive of the Northwestern Hemisphere. 
A manhunt ensues, and Sweetmint, armed with courage, intellect, and unwavering love for her brother, sets off on a mission to find him before it’s too late. With five days until the hemisphere’s big election, Sweetmint must dodge a relentless law officer who’s determined to maintain order and an ambitious politician with sights set on becoming the next Chief Executive by any means necessary.
With the awe-inspiring defiance of The Power and the ever-shifting machinations of House of Cards , This Great Hemisphere is a novel that brilliantly illustrates the degree to which reality can be shaped by non-truths and vicious manipulations, while shining a light on our ability to surprise ourselves when we stop giving in to the narratives others have written for us.

My Review:

Shakespeare said it best, but the Bard said an awful lot of things very, very well, which is why we keep quoting him. In The Merchant of Venice (Act 1, Scene 3), there’s a famous proverb that says that, “The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose.” It’s something the reader is forced to reckon with in This Great Hemisphere – even if the characters for the most part don’t have the education to recognize the phenomenon.

They’re not supposed to. That’s part of the story. In fact, a more accurate paraphrase of that quote as it applies to This Great Hemisphere would be that “the devil can WRITE Scripture for his purpose.” because that is exactly what has happened during the five centuries between our now and the future experienced by Sweetmint and her people.

As Sweetmint discovers over the course of this story, there’s another quote that applies even more, from a part of the Bible that the powers-that-be of the Northwestern Hemisphere have undoubtedly excised as part of their thoroughgoing revision of Scripture to suit their purposes. It’s the one from Ecclesiastes (1:9) that goes: “What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.” Or as it was put more succinctly in Battlestar Galactica, “This has all happened before. All of this will happen again.”

But Sweetmint and her friends do not know any of this when her story begins. It may have all happened before – in fact it has all happened before – but it hasn’t happened before TO HER and her perspective is what carries the story from hope and compliance to desperation, rebellion and tragedy. And maybe, just maybe, back to hope – or at least a brief approximation thereof.

But what is it that has happened before? Sweetmint’s story – or the story that takes place around her and through her, is just the kind of metaphor that science fiction does well when it takes an issue that is real and present – and generally terrible – and shifts it in time and space, alters just a few of the parameters – and forces the reader to see an obscured truth for what it really is.

This Great Hemisphere is set on Earth, five centuries into a future where a portion of the human population is born invisible. Because humans are gonna human, and governments always need a common enemy to class as less than human to keep everyone else in line, invisibles have been cast as a threat and dehumanized in every way possible. They are denied higher education, voting rights, land ownership, good jobs, good housing, etc., etc., etc. Denied all of those things by law and forced to live in remote villages so that the dominant population can never really know them so that they can be more easily demonized.

Sweetmint is supposed to be a “model Invisible” and has earned a place as an intern – not a servant, but an actual intern – with one of the men responsible for the creation of this system. He’s using her for the next step in his “great plan”.

But we see this broken society through Sweetmint’s eyes as the scales are removed from them. She learns that nothing she believes bears much of any resemblance to any objective truth and that the system is rotten from within – always has been and intends to always be so.

What makes the story so compelling is that even as we watch it unravel, we’re still riveted by her attempts to force a new way through. That even though it may be hopeless in the long run, there can be a reprieve in the short run – and possibly more. And we’re there for her and for it – even if the specific future she hoped for is not.

Escape Rating A-: I obviously had a lot of thoughts about this as I was reading it, and I have more. It’s that kind of book.

It does absolutely fly by. The author has done an excellent job of creating a world that is firmly rooted in the history we know and yet manages to shine a light on it from a different corner. Using invisibility as a metaphor for race allows the reader to be firmly grounded in our own historical perspective and yet provides a vector by which anyone can imagine themselves as Sweetmint because there are circumstances in which anyone can be rendered invisible.

I’m all over the map on what I thought and felt about this book, and it’s making writing it up all kinds of difficult. On the one hand, as I said, it’s compelling to read. On a second hand, I felt like the social issues part was a bit heavy-handed – but at the same time, I recognize that my own background makes me more familiar with some of the issues – albeit from a slightly different angle, and as someone whose read a lot of history the repetitive patterns are not exactly news.

From the point of view of someone who reads a lot of science fiction, this very much fits into the spec fic, SFnal tradition of exploring an all too real past and present issue by setting it in either a time or place away from the here and now. Something that even the original Star Trek series did both well and badly – sometimes at the same time – and there’s an episode that’s particularly on point in this regard, Let That Be Your Last Battlefield.

In other words, in yet another attempt to make a long story short and probably fail at it again, This Great Hemisphere is a compelling story, both because of Sweetmint’s originally naive perspective and because the actual political machinations going and increasing enmeshment in the consequences of them – sometimes intentionally but often not. And the ending – oh that was a stunner in a way that just capped off the whole thing while still leaving just a glimmer of possibility – if not necessarily a good one – for the world in which it happens.