Grade A #AudioBookReview: Why Don’t We Just Kill the Kid in the Omelas Hole by Isabel J Kim

Grade A #AudioBookReview: Why Don’t We Just Kill the Kid in the Omelas Hole by Isabel J Kim“Why Don't We Just Kill the Kid in the Omelas Hole” by Isabel J. Kim in Clarkesworld, Issue 209, February 2024 by Isabel J. Kim
Narrator: Kate Baker
Format: ebook, podcast
Source: podcast, supplied by publisher via Hugo Packet
Formats available: magazine, podcast
Genres: dystopian, science fiction, short stories
Series: Clarkesworld Magazine Issue 209 February 2024
Pages: 10
Length: 22 minutes
Published by Clarkesworld Magazine on February 10, 2024
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazonBarnes & NobleKobo
Goodreads

Clarkesworld is a Hugo and World Fantasy Award-winning science fiction and fantasy magazine. Each month we bring you a mix of fiction, articles, interviews and art. Our February 2024 issue (#209) contains:
Original fiction by H.H. Pak ("Scalp"), Rajeev Prasad ("The Flowers That We Intend To Share"), Zohar Jacobs ("The Enceladus South Pole Base Named after V.I. Lenin"), David Goodman ("Kardashev''s Palimpsest"), Yang Wanqing ("The Peregrine Falcon Flies West"), Isabel J. Kim ("Why Don''t We Just Kill the Kid In the Omelas Hole"), Ryan Marie Ketterer ("The Beam Eidolon"), and Meghan Feldman ("Lonely Ghosts").
Non-fiction includes an article by Ben Lockwood, interviews with Wole Talabi and Bogi Takacs, and an editorial by Neil Clarke.

My Review:

Once upon a time – back in 1973 – Ursula K. Le Guin published a short story that exists on an uncomfortable border between science fiction and philosophy titled “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas.” It’s one of those stories that rips you to pieces on first reading and keeps swirling around in your head well after you’ve read it.

Which I never did. Not back in the day, not in the intervening years since. At least not until I set out to read THIS short story and learned that “Why Don’t We Just Kill the Kid in the Omelas Hole” is in dialogue with Le Guin’s original story. Or it’s in dialogue with all of the commentary about the original story and all of the other stories that have been written in dialogue with the original story.

The reading jury is still out on that last bit but I knew I needed the foundational story to get why it’s still being written about and towards and against more than fifty years later.

(If you want to listen as well, there’s an audio collection of Le Guin’s short stories titled The Unreal and the Real available through Kindle Unlimited. That’s how I finally read – or had read to me – the original story. And it’s still a hell of a story fifty years later. There’s a reason Le Guin became a Grand Master of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America, among many, many other awards.)

What makes this story so searing is that it’s a ‘greater good’ story where “the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or of the one” that explores just how problematic and even false those beliefs are when the one has no choice in the matter.

The problem with both of those philosophies, the way that they can and often do so horribly wrong, is rooted in the problem of ‘who decides?”.

SpockView Post’s sacrifice in The Wrath of Khan was both noble and heartbreaking because he made the decision. He CHOSE to sacrifice his life to save the crew of the Enterprise. If someone had shoved him into that chamber and forced him to fix the reactor at the cost of his own life, it becomes something else altogether.

That second version is the story in the original “Omelas” story. That the Omelas can have a beautiful utopia if they are willing to neglect, abuse and torture a child in order to ensure it. The story was searing enough in 1973, but this story, written in a much more cynical 2024, strips away the fig leaf of whether or not the child’s unwilling, unwitting sacrifice actually achieves the goal – or whether the child is merely a scapegoat and sin eater for the Omelas’ very real human behaviors and failures.

Because humans are gonna human, and they certainly do in this story, and their behavior is even more horrific than any of them want to think about, let alone believe.

Escape Rating A: What makes this story work, so many decades after the original, is the way that it grounds the Omelas in the here and now as it strips the mask of the Omelas themselves bare.

In the original story, the Omelas and their city are a thought experiment. We don’t know where or when they are, just that their behavior is reprehensible and that they feel justified because it’s for ‘the greater good’.

This story sets the city of the Omelas in the here and now, in a world where everyone knows about the Omelas, the internet is watching and commenting on the Omelas, and the people who rise up against the Omelas’ treatment of the “load-bearing, suffering child” are determined to stop the practice because whatever is going on isn’t achieving anything except suffering.

Even as the internet, and the world at large, watch and comment and invent conspiracy theories while being gleeful that the awful Omelas are not themselves – even though from a certain perspective, they absolutely are.

I may have made a mistake in finishing this story right before going to bed, but I’m glad that it was the final story in my Hugo Readalong. Clearly, between this story and “We Will Teach You How to Read | We Will Teach You How to Read”, I saved the best for last.

It also made this story – as well as Le Guin’s original story – more affecting in audio than they would have been in text. Particularly this contemporary written story, as there was a wry archness to Kate Baker’s reading that was perfect for this story. I could hear the inflections and the eye rolls, and it made the story just that much better.

And this completes my personal Hugo nominee read along. The stories were mostly good to great, and I had a great time reading and/or listening to them. THIS STORY recently won the Nebula for Best Short Story. We’ll see if it wins the Hugo as well when the winners are announced this coming Saturday, August 16, at the Seattle WorldCon. I can’t wait to find out who won!

A- #AudioBookReview: We Will Teach You How to Read | We Will Teach You How to Read by Caroline M Yoachim

A- #AudioBookReview: We Will Teach You How to Read | We Will Teach You How to Read by Caroline M Yoachim“We Will Teach You How to Read | We Will Teach You How to Read” by Caroline M. Yoachim in Lightspeed Magazine Issue 168 May 2024 by Caroline M. Yoachim
Narrator: Stefan Rudnicki, Ruth Wallman, Alison Belle Bews, Caroline M. Yoachim
Format: ebook, podcast
Source: podcast, supplied by publisher via Hugo Packet
Formats available: magazine, podcast
Genres: science fiction, short stories
Series: Lightspeed Magazine Issue 168 May 2024
Pages: 21
Length: 18 minutes
Published by Lightspeed Magazine on May 1, 2024
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazonBarnes & NobleKobo
Goodreads

LIGHTSPEED is a digital science fiction and fantasy magazine. In its pages, you will find science fiction: from near-future, sociological soft SF, to far-future, star-spanning hard SF-and fantasy: from epic fantasy, sword-and-sorcery, and contemporary urban tales, to magical realism, science-fantasy, and folktales.

Welcome to issue 168 of LIGHTSPEED! One of the things speculative fiction does best is exploring different kinds of minds via the use of unusual story structures. Well, we're kicking off this issue with a powerful story that nearly breaks the very nature of reading! "We Will Teach You How To Read We Will Teach You How To Read" by Caroline M. Yoachim tells the story of an alien culture in a fresh, exciting format. Luckily for you, we've included instructions to help you understand every fantastic page. We also have a new original science fiction story by Nisi Shawl: "Over a Long Time Ago," a dark tale of unhappy relationships and space exploration. Stephen Geigen-Miller also delves into space exploration in his flash piece "The Last Thing They See Is Laika." Ash Howell's story of gene manipulation "Chaos Theory" joins our flash SF. Ben Peek returns to the Ministry of Saturn in his dark fantasy story "Exit Interview." P H Lee explores the nature of tricksters in their alternate history tale "Richard Nixon and the Princess of Crows." We also have a flash story ("Done Deal") from Rory Harper, and another ("And the Dreams That You Dare to Dream") from Marissa Lingen. In nonfiction, we have a terrific array of book reviews, and of course, our spotlight interviewers have sat down with our authors to get more insight into their stories.

My Review:

The first three short stories in my Hugo nominee readings were not ‘all that’ as the saying goes. Either they didn’t have enough room to work, they didn’t work for me, or they just plain didn’t work. I’m not alone in that opinion, as the contributors to the Hugo Readalong on reddit had similar thoughts. I want to say that this is a case of ‘great minds think alike’, but even if it’s just that we all went down the same rabbit hole, it is what it is.

This penultimate story in my personal readalong turned out to be one of my favorites. I think I LIKED this one more than the last story, but I think that one had a bit more to say. Or something like that. The two together certainly made my voting decision a LOT harder than those first three stories led me to believe – and I’m glad of it.

The decision, after all, is supposed to be hard. At least at the top of the ballot. This and the last story, “Why Don’t We Just Kill the Kid in the Omelas Hole?” did make it a whole lot more difficult. They turned a mostly ‘meh’ list into an ‘eeny, meany, miney, moe’ choice.

When I first saw the title of THIS story, I thought it was a typo. It’s not. Instead, it’s the first hint of the experimental way this story is told. An experiment which works fantastically well in audio and doesn’t hit nearly as hard in text (at least according to Mr. Reading Reality) – although it certainly tries.

But seriously, get the audio. It’s free and only takes 20 minutes to listen to and it’s so worth it.

The story, within the story, within the story, because that’s part of the structure, is told side-by-side-by-side. Which is what makes the audio work as each of the iterations is read by a distinctly different voice, and those voices overlapping conveys the import of the whole thing, as this is a story of an oral tradition being told by a people or race or species that is dying.

Their own people have fallen away from their traditional telling, and they’re desperate to tell their story as it’s meant to be told, one last time, to the humans who have taken over or conquered them or simply assimilated what’s left of their people.

We don’t know, because we don’t need to know and that’s not what they are trying to tell us. They just want to be remembered in their own words for who they actually were and not what later, fragmented history will make of them – if it makes anything of them at all.

Which makes this story both quite beautiful and heartbreakingly sad and feel like a sigh of relief, all at the same time.

Escape Rating A-: What made this story work for me, and work really well, is that underlying the actual message of the thing it bears a sharp and equally heartbreaking resemblance to the Star Trek Next Gen episode “The Inner Light”. (If you’re trying to remember which one that is, it’s the one with the flute.)

In that episode, Picard experiences the life of a man named Kamin, living out that life as an ironworker on the planet Kataan. He experiences an entire life – love and grief and joy and happiness and everything in between – but when Kamin dies in the memory Picard is returned to the present and the Enterprise. The people of Kataan died out long ago, but one of their final acts as a people was to send out a probe that allowed others, as Picard has just done, to experience their lives as they were.

It’s the same kind of legacy that the people of THIS story were so desperate to leave behind, although the medium they used was very different.

Because the way this story is told in text, with its parallel lines of similar but not exactly alike versions of the story, is meant to be grasped as a whole and not as the separate streams our human brains want it to be, it works fantastically well in audio as the marvelous voice cast (Stefan Rudnicki, Ruth Wallman, Allison Belle Bews, and the author Caroline M. Yoachim) can speak over each other and in counterpoint to give a sense of the fullness of the story as it would traditionally be told.

So take the time. Listen, and then listen again because there’s more in the repetition, as there should be.

#AudioBookReview: Five Views of the Planet Tartarus by Rachael K Jones

#AudioBookReview: Five Views of the Planet Tartarus by Rachael K Jones“Five Views of the Planet Tartarus” by Rachael K Jones in Lightspeed Magazine Issue 164 January 2024 by Rachael K. Jones
Narrator: Justine Eyre
Format: ebook, podcast
Source: podcast, supplied by publisher via Hugo Packet
Formats available: magazine, podcast
Genres: science fiction, short stories
Series: Lightspeed Magazine Issue 164 January 2024
Pages: 10
Length: 5 minutes
on January 1, 2024
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazonBarnes & NobleKobo
Goodreads

LIGHTSPEED is a digital science fiction and fantasy magazine. In its pages, you will find science fiction: from near-future, sociological soft SF, to far-future, star-spanning hard SF-and fantasy: from epic fantasy, sword-and-sorcery, and contemporary urban tales, to magical realism, science-fantasy, and folktales.

Welcome to issue 164 of LIGHTSPEED! Our science fiction shorts kick off with a story ("Shadow Films") from Benjamin Peek about the film industry and a conspiracy theory sprouting from an unsettling truth. In the very poignant tale "We Shall Not Be Bitter at the End of the World," David Anaxagoras captures an unusual group trying to cope with an incipient apocalypse. We also have a flash story ("Five Views of the Planet Tartarus") from Rachael K. Jones, and another ("Night Desk Duty at the Infinite Paradox Hotel") from Aimee Ogden. Our fantasy shorts include a fascinating meditation on sacrifice and inter-species understanding in Sloane Leong's "A Saint Between the Teeth." Adam-Troy Castro returns to our pages with a new story about an irresistible offer in "Farewell to Faust." We also have two terrific flash pieces: "In the Tree's Hollow, a Doe" by Lowry Poletti and "To Be a Happy Man" from Thomas Ha. Of course we've got our usual array of nonfiction: book reviews from our review team (what should you be reading when you're not reading Lightspeed?), and spotlight interviews with our authors. And our ebook readers will enjoy an excerpt from Amy Avery's new novel THE LONGEST AUTUMN.

My Review:

I listened to the final three Hugo Short Story nominees in a single evening. In the practical sense, that wasn’t hard as they are all, indeed, short. So now that I have finished the lot, I can say unequivocally, IMHO, that there’s definitely a divide in the set. The first three I read/listened to weren’t terrible, but they either weren’t special or didn’t grab me or were so experimental they didn’t land or didn’t have enough room to work or all of the above.

The three I listened to, all on the same night, all did interesting things, told their stories in interesting ways, grabbed me hard or used their experimental structure to its utmost AND remained comprehensible. AND they used every word at their disposal to great effect.

“Five Views of the Planet Tartarus” was short, bitter and ended in an absolute gut punch of a reveal – and only needed 549 words to wreck my brain in the process.

First, the title is a big, freaking huge, ginormous hint that this is not going to be a comfortable story. If the name “Tartarus” sounds familiar, that’s because you’ve heard it before in other contexts that are all intended to invoke the original. In Greek mythology, Tartarus is the deep abyss that is used as a dungeon of torment and suffering for the wicked. It’s the place where souls were judged after death and where the wicked received divine punishment.

In other words, Tartarus is HELL. Figuratively and literally. The Tartarus of this story may be inverted, in that this Tartarus is a planet and its version of hell is the ‘asteroid’ belt around the planet instead of a deep, dark chasm ON the planet, but hell is, well, still hell.

The story follows a simple pattern, one that is seen often in fanfic, where there are X times that something happens and often (but not always and not in this case) one time it doesn’t. Each of those times – or in this case views – are short and usually disastrous in one way or another – but not THIS disastrous.

In this story it’s a ship filled with prisoners on its way to Tartarus, viewing the planet from afar, those same prisoners being tried, then processed for sentencing, the sentence carried out, and then their incarceration. Which is where the story goes full circle and all the things that were foreshadowed in the first part hit home at the end.

Which, to return to an earlier statement as the story itself does, hits like a gut punch, leaving the reader wet-eyed and breathless.

Escape Rating B+: The story is a bit of a tease in that we know nothing about the crimes committed or the reasons this system evolved the way we see in the story. Howsomever, it certainly does stick the dismount, while the story itself is so simple that the reader isn’t really braced for it and it sticks harder than it otherwise might.

It also sticks harder because this story just does so much more with its brief length and its experimental nature than those first three stories. I was hoping for something better or more interesting or both and was happy as well as a bit winded from that gut punch that I got exactly that.

This story didn’t so much fall into the middle of my Hugo voting as rise above it. Then the final two stories topped that, as you’ll see in my final two reviews in this ‘series’.

#BookReview: Three Faces of a Beheading by Arkady Martine

#BookReview: Three Faces of a Beheading by Arkady Martine"Three Faces of a Beheading" by Arkady Martine in Uncanny Magazine, Issue 58, May/June 2024 by Arkady Martine
Format: ebook
Source: supplied by publisher via Hugo Packet
Formats available: magazine
Genres: science fiction, short stories
Series: Uncanny Magazine Issue 58 May/June 2024
Pages: 22
Published by Uncanny Magazine on May 7, 2024
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazonBarnes & NobleKobo
Goodreads

The May/June 2024 issue of Hugo Award-winning Uncanny Magazine.

Featuring new fiction by Arkady Martine, Sarah Rees Brennan, Tia Tashiro, Eugenia Triantafyllou, Rati Mehotra, K.S. Walker, and John Wiswell. Essays by John Scalzi, Amy Berg, Dawn Xiana Moon, and Cara Liebowitz, poetry by Angela Liu, Ali Trotta, Nwuguru Chidiebere Sullivan, and Fran Wilde, interviews with Arkady Martine and K.S. Walker by Caroline M. Yoachim, a cover by Zara Alfonso, and an editorial by Lynne M. Thomas and Michael Damian Thomas.

Uncanny Magazine is a bimonthly science fiction and fantasy magazine first published in November 2014. Edited by 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2023 Hugo award winners for best semiprozine, and 2018 Hugo award winners for Best Editor, Short Form, Lynne M. Thomas and Michael Damian Thomas, and Monte Lin, each issue of Uncanny includes new stories, poetry, articles, and interviews.

My Review:

The actual Hugo ballots have to be turned in by midnight PDT on July 23, making this an absolutely fitting thing to post today. At this point I have read all the stories so that I could vote responsibly, but I’ll continue to post reviews until just before Worldcon opens, as no one will know what the results will be until then.

Although I had expectations of the author as I fell hard for A Memory Called Empire, I had no idea what this story was about. Now that I’ve read it, I’m still not sure I do.

That being said, the interview with the author, also in the same issue of Uncanny Magazine, provides considerably more insight into the story than reading the story did. At least for this reader. Your reading mileage may definitely vary.

Based on the author’s interview, “Three Faces of a Beheading” is intended to be an experimental fic, written from, not just several points of view but in several different styles of perspectives, from first-person to second to different variations of third.

As if that wasn’t confusing enough for the reader, all of those perspectives are drawn from Melissa Scott’s Burning Bright, originally published in 1993. It’s a story set on a planet known for its virtual reality games. The book sounds fascinating, it’s cheap in ebook, and I just threw it on the virtually towering TBR pile because I want to read it.

But I haven’t read it yet so I didn’t get the references.

I did sorta/kinda pick up that the intent of the story was to show – not tell but SHOW – how difficult it is for creators to create and expose their creations in the midst of a crisis and/or a repressive regime or both. It’s about just how rebellious and revolutionary an act it can be to speak your truth when your truth is considered subversive.

Howsomever, that idea also got a bit lost in the experimental nature of the thing.

The part I did get without the interview – because it’s an idea that always fascinates me and has always been professionally relevant – is that this story dives as deep as a short story can into the confluence of “Who lives, who dies, who tells your story?” and “History is written by the victors.”

That’s the message that came through clearly for this reader, the way that, particularly over time, the ‘accepted truth’ – which is not the same as the actual truth, even for selected values of ‘accepted’ and especially ‘truth’ –  that those two concepts differ and outright diverge depending on who has the axe and which way they want to grind it. Which is exactly what humans do, as we rationalize so much that is either too difficult or too dangerous to believe even as we soften the edges or exaggerate the high points over time and distance.

Escape Rating C: I’m so tempted to say that an ‘Escape Rating’ for “Three Faces of a Beheading” is an impossibility – because I didn’t. Escape, that is. Instead I found myself grasping at straws as my thoughts tried to pull this one into a coherent whole that isn’t meant to be. At least not for this reader. Your mileage, again, may vary.

So far, my Hugo short story readings have not been nearly as entertaining, absorbing, or just plain fun as my novella readings. Based on the Hugo Readalong on reddit, I’m not alone in that, either. Howsomever, the three I have left seem to be the best of the lot, at least by consensus of that group. I hope they’re right because this category just HAS to get better!

#BookReview: Stitched to Skin Like Family Is by Nghi Vo

#BookReview: Stitched to Skin Like Family Is by Nghi Vo“Stitched to Skin Like Family Is” by Nghi Vo in Uncanny Magazine, Issue 57, March/April 2024 by Nghi Vo
Format: ebook
Source: supplied by publisher via Hugo Packet
Formats available: magazine
Genres: fantasy, historical fantasy
Series: Uncanny Magazine Issue 57 March/April 2024
Pages: 19
Published by Uncanny Magazine on March 5, 2024
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazonBarnes & NobleKobo
Goodreads

The March/April 2024 issue of Hugo Award-winning Uncanny Magazine.

Featuring new fiction by Nghi Vo, Lavie Tidhar, Katherine Ewell, Annalee Newitz, Valerie Valdes, Parlei Rivière, and Amanda Helms. Essays by John Scalzi, G. Willow Wilson, Filip Hajdar Drnovšek Zorko, and Brandon O'Brien, poetry by Jennifer Mace, Zaynab Iliyasu Bobi, Tiffany Morris, and Eva Papasoulioti, interviews with Nghi Vo and Valerie Valdes by Caroline M. Yoachim, a cover by Antonio Javier Caparo, and an editorial by Lynne M. Thomas and Michael Damian Thomas.

Uncanny Magazine is a bimonthly science fiction and fantasy magazine first published in November 2014. Edited by 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2023 Hugo award winners for best semiprozine, and 2018 Hugo award winners for Best Editor, Short Form, Lynne M. Thomas and Michael Damian Thomas, and Monte Lin, each issue of Uncanny includes new stories, poetry, articles, and interviews.

My Review:

The fun – if sometimes frustrating – thing about reading the Hugo nominated novelettes and short stories is that I generally go into the reading without much in the way of preconceived notions about the story itself.

That doesn’t mean I’m not already acquainted with the author, but that I haven’t seen anything in the way of reviews or summaries – at least not until the Hugo Readalong discussions over on Reddit get into full swing.

Which they certainly have at this point as the votes are due later this month.

But I did come into this one with a few, not so much notions about the story as notions about whether or not I’d like the story – because this is an author I do know as the author of the Singing Hills Cycle. A novella series which I love, one of which (The Brides of High Hill) is nominated in the novella category – and deservedly so.

So it is not a surprise that this story did remind me, at least a bit, of Singing Hills in its tone. But the story of the author’s that it really reminded me of is On the Fox Roads, a novelette nominee from 2024. Apparently the author has written several other short works in this loosely historical American setting – and I wish I had a definitive list of them because the two I have read have been fascinating.

Although I have to confess that On the Fox Roads worked better for me, I think because as a novelette it has a little more room to work. I still liked this in its bittersweet tone as a story of family and justice and revenge and love.

Escape Rating B: After turning the final page, I think that this story reads like fantasy that is so dark it tips over the edge into horror just a bit. It also reminded me just a tiny bit of The Keeper of Magical Things by Julie Leong as the protagonists of the two stories have similar magical talents – although Keeper is rather cozy and Stitched most definitely is NOT. This one drew me in from the very beginning even though at first I had no idea where it was going. The language of it was beautiful, as I expected from the author – I did have some expectations after all – but I’d have liked this more if it had had more room to work.

I have more nominated short stories to come, but so far these are not quite living up to the novelettes. We’ll see as my read through continues!

#AudioBookReview: Marginalia by Mary Robinette Kowal

#AudioBookReview: Marginalia by Mary Robinette Kowal“Marginalia” by Mary Robinette Kowal in Uncanny Magazine, Issue 56, January/February 2024 by Mary Robinette Kowal
Narrator: Erika Ensign
Format: ebook, podcast
Source: podcast, supplied by publisher via Hugo Packet
Formats available: magazine, podcast
Genres: fantasy, short stories
Series: Uncanny Magazine Issue 56 January/February 2024
Pages: 25
Length: 40 minutes
Published by Uncanny Magazine on January 2, 2024
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazonBarnes & NobleKobo
Goodreads

The January/February 2024 issue of Hugo Award-winning Uncanny Magazine.

Featuring new fiction by Mary Robinette Kowal, Jordan Taylor, Jana Bianchi, Natalia Theodoridou, Ana Hurtado, Cheri Kamei, and Angela Liu. Essays by John Scalzi, Alex Jennings, Cecilia Tan, and Amanda Wakaruk and Olav Rokne, poetry by Ali Trota, Ai Jiang, C.S.E. Cooney, and Sodïq Oyèkànmí, interviews with Jordan Taylor and Natalia Theodoridou by Caroline M. Yoachim, a cover by Galen Dara, and an editorial by Lynne M. Thomas and Michael Damian Thomas.

Uncanny Magazine is a bimonthly science fiction and fantasy magazine first published in November 2014. Edited by 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2023 Hugo Award winners for best semiprozine, and 2018 Hugo Award winners for Best Editor, Short Form, Lynne M. Thomas and Michael Damian Thomas, and Monte Lin, each issue of Uncanny includes new stories, poetry, articles, and interviews.

My Review:

This entry in my Hugo Award nominee readings moves the dial from the novelettes to the short stories. I picked this one to go first in that category because the author is one that I’ve certainly enjoyed in longer forms, notably her Lady Astronaut series and The Spare Man.

Having finished this story, I have a feeling that it made the Hugo Ballot because I’m not alone in that name recognition and affection for her longer works. Because this short just didn’t gel, particularly in comparison to the novelette nominees.

Yes, I know they’re not the same thing, and the novelettes have a bit more room to work, but still, with the novelette nominees even the ones that didn’t work as well FOR ME still had very interesting things to say and/or said those things in interesting ways.

“Marginalia” is, well, the most apropos title this story could have, because that’s exactly what the story feels like – marginalia. Something that got scribbled around the edges of something bigger or more important. It’s also a bit of an academic in-joke as well as a potential explanation for the absolutely stellar giant snail monsters, but from this perspective, it captures the nature of the story a bit too well and not in a good way.

It may be that this is trying to do too many things in a very small number of pages, of which a few too many are taken up by an imperious cat (and I’m saying that in spite of how much I love cats in general and this one in particular), and not nearly enough glitter from the slime left behind by the giant snail monsters.

Those giant snails are the best part.

Overall, this is very much a typical medieval fantasy-type setting, where the main characters are Margery, a young woman caring for her dying mother, her younger brother Hugh, dreaming of adventure beyond their little farm, and the nobleman Lord Strange doing his best to keep his lands and people safe from the rampaging giant snails. And, of course, the snails doing the rampaging.

The boy disobeys his sister, keeps the nobleman safe from the snails – and the sister does the heroic thing and saves not just the day but all the lands ravaged by the snails. Not through might, but through ingenuity.

The ending falls a bit flat because it doesn’t end satisfactorily. The boy gets his wish, the nobleman realizes he knows nothing about how the people in his demesne really live, the mother dies to set her children free and Margery is left standing on the horns of a dilemma, knowing that her future has the possibility of being brighter than her past and completely uncertain which way to step to make it so.

Escape Rating C: “Marginalia” feels like a story that’s a bit of a filler. Putting it another way, the story lives up to, or more appropriately down to, its title, as marginalia are, according to Wikipedia, “marks made in the margins of a book or other document.” The bits around the outside edges of something else. Whether that something else was a bigger story, or in this case whether that something else should have been pitched at a younger audience, either way this story is fun enough for its length – or its length in audio, but no more than that.

I did listen to the podcast, I enjoyed Erika Ensign’s reading and it was the perfect length for a short drive, but there’s just not a lot of there, well, there. The giant snails were the best part and they’re just doing what their nature intended.

Meanwhile, I’m left hoping that the rest of the short story nominees rise above this one.

#AudioBookReview: Loneliness Universe by Eugenia Triantafyllou

#AudioBookReview: Loneliness Universe by Eugenia Triantafyllou“Loneliness Universe” by Eugenia Triantafyllou in Uncanny Magazine, Issue 58, May/June 2024 by Eugenia Triantafyllou
Narrator: Matt Peters
Format: ebook, podcast
Source: podcast, supplied by publisher via Hugo Packet
Formats available: magazine, podcast
Genres: science fiction, short stories
Series: Uncanny Magazine Issue 58 May/June 2024
Pages: 30
Length: 50 minutes
Published by Uncanny Magazine on May 7, 2024
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazonBarnes & NobleKobo
Goodreads

The May/June 2024 issue of Hugo Award-winning Uncanny Magazine.

Featuring new fiction by Arkady Martine, Sarah Rees Brennan, Tia Tashiro, Eugenia Triantafyllou, Rati Mehotra, K.S. Walker, and John Wiswell. Essays by John Scalzi, Amy Berg, Dawn Xiana Moon, and Cara Liebowitz, poetry by Angela Liu, Ali Trotta, Nwuguru Chidiebere Sullivan, and Fran Wilde, interviews with Arkady Martine and K.S. Walker by Caroline M. Yoachim, a cover by Zara Alfonso, and an editorial by Lynne M. Thomas and Michael Damian Thomas.

Uncanny Magazine is a bimonthly science fiction and fantasy magazine first published in November 2014. Edited by 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2023 Hugo award winners for best semiprozine, and 2018 Hugo award winners for Best Editor, Short Form, Lynne M. Thomas and Michael Damian Thomas, and Monte Lin, each issue of Uncanny includes new stories, poetry, articles, and interviews.

My Review:

The title does give the theme of the story away, as this is very much a story about loneliness, being alone and being unable to connect with those closest to you. The way the loneliness works in this story, as soon as Neferi even GETS somewhat close to someone, they then become utterly inaccessible to her.

Except through social media, which may or may not be the cause of the loneliness in the story. Behind the story, social media may be one of the possible triggers for the ‘why’ of the story being written, although there are plenty of other possibilities for THAT, ranging from the isolation of the pandemic to being ‘too busy’ with life and work to connect in the moment to the people who are closest, to the isolation of depression, of the feeling that one can’t connect or that no one will understand or shame over the diagnosis or the feeling that one is not worthy of connection because of the depression.

And it could be because so many of us move away from our birthplaces and our families because of work or opportunities or whatever, and keep moving, that we lose connections with those held most deeply in our hearts. Or the multiverse is just playing tricks on everyone.

Or, of course, all of the above. The reasons behind the story – and the reason the disconnect happens within the story – are in the mind of the reader.

What happens IN the story, from Neferi’s increasingly isolated perspective, is that her attempt to get back in touch with her oldest and dearest friend, a person she hasn’t seen in years, results in the universe drawing away from her or Neferi being pulled out of it.

She and Cara are in the same place, at the same time, but they can’t see or talk with each other. They can only make contact through increasingly fraught texts, as each thinks the other is playing a trick, while Cara gets angry and Neferi panics.

She panics even further when she returns home to the Athens apartment she shares with her brother to discover that even though they are in the same space, they can’t see each other. They can only see the evidence of habitation that each leaves behind. Like empty food containers and ‘missing’ bags of chips.

Which is where things get both interesting and very, very weird. For this to be happening to just one person, Neferi, means that it could be all in her head – as horrible as that thought is. It’s also EXACTLY what all of Neferi’s family and friends believe is happening, no matter how much she tries to explain things through her one medium of communication with the ‘outside’ world – social media.

At least, not until the same phenomenon happens to every single one of them, leaving them each isolated in their own bubble, only able to reach out through some form of social media – or through a game which they all share.

Where they build, anew, the connections between them all.

Escape Rating B: This is explicitly NOT a comfortable story. Whatever one might think about the increasing isolation of contemporary society, the idea of being forcibly removed from it completely is chilling in this interpretation.

And we see Neferi get, well, chilled in multiple different ways as she passes through something that looks a lot like the seven stages of grief. She’s alone, her family doesn’t believe her, her attempts to make new connections in the world she has left result in heartbreak and further isolation. If her isolation isn’t the result of depression then depression absolutely is one of its results.

The craft of the story is fascinating. This is a story where sight and sound and direct vocal communication have ALL fallen away. All that’s left is social media, so texts, DMs and similar methods are all that Neferi has to work with – and all that the story has to work with as well. It’s LIKE an epistolary story updated for the 21st century, and it works well in the way that it blends what communication she does receive with her thoughts and feelings – even when those have practically shut down.

I kind of expected the game she and her family are playing to be the road back to unity, but it both is and isn’t. It’s a temporary stopgap but not a solution. Which makes the story even more uncomfortable for the characters AND the reader. We WANT a happy ending – or at least a firm resolution, but neither is to be found.

There’s a readalong for all of the Hugo nominees on reddit, and I’m mentioning it here because one comment in the discussion thread  for this story is “This hit me right in the gonna have to talk about this one with my therapist spot” which might constitute a trigger warning for some readers. If you’re already having a ‘down’ period, this might not be a good story to start. I listened to it late at night in the dark and it made the whole thing even sadder and a bit creepier. Your reading and listening mileage may vary.

But speaking of the audio, while the narrator did a good job, his voice didn’t match her character and it was a bit jarring at first. If the story had been told from her brother’s point of view this narrator would have been excellent.

This has turned out to be the penultimate – meaning next-to-last – entry in my Hugo novelette nomination readings, because I’m now officially on the fence about how I’m going to vote. Not about first place, but the order in which my other votes go. (Because of the voting system used for the Hugos, it actually does matter.) Which means I DO need to reread Lake of Souls to see how it stacks up to the others. So I will do just that in the weeks ahead.

A- #AudioBookReview: The Brotherhood of Montague St. Video by Thomas Ha

A- #AudioBookReview: The Brotherhood of Montague St. Video by Thomas Ha“The Brotherhood of Montague St. Video” by Thomas Ha in Clarkesworld, Issue 212, May 2024 by Thomas Ha
Narrator: Kate Baker
Format: ebook, podcast
Source: podcast, supplied by publisher via Hugo Packet
Formats available: magazine, podcast
Genres: dystopian, science fiction, short stories
Series: Clarkesworld Magazine Issue 212 May 2024
Pages: 20
Length: 50 minutes
Published by Clarkesworld Magazine on April 29, 2024
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazonBarnes & NobleKobo
Goodreads

Clarkesworld is a Hugo and World Fantasy Award-winning science fiction and fantasy magazine. Each month we bring you a mix of fiction, articles, interviews and art. Our May 2024 issue (#212) fiction by Alice Towey ("Fishy"), Fiona Moore ("The Portmeirion Road"), Carolyn Zhao ("In Which Caruth is Correct"), Thomas Ha ("The Brotherhood of Montague St. Video"), Samara Auman ("The Texture of Memory, of Light"), Rajeev Prasad ("The Blinding Light of Resurrection"), Carlie St. George ("The Weight of Your Own Ashes"), and K. J. Khan ("Our Father").Non-fiction includes an article by D.A. Xiaolin Spires, interviews with Andrea Hairston and Andrea Kriz, and an editorial by Neil Clarke.

My Review:

I came into this story not quite sure what I was getting into. Probably not helped by reading the “St.” in the title as “Saint” instead of “Street”. I think the “Brotherhood” bit led me astray.

But only a bit.

The opening of this story was a bit jarring, when the unnamed narrator goes to the library and picks up what he calls a “dead book” and is so surprised about it. It’s an interesting opening for a story that winds its way around to the idea that “dead books” and any other media that is fixed in time and can’t be “fixed” in content is more alive – or has more life in it – than the reverse.

The way that it gets there is a story about what we remember vs. what really happened, about what we hang onto vs. what we keep, and the idea that stories are not meant to make us comfortable, they are meant to make us think.

But the way that it gets there is through one young man’s grief over the death of his mother, his desire to remember her and their relationship as it really was and not “enhanced” or “improved” or “optimized” to make the “story” come out better than it really happened.

The protagonist’s desire to preserve his true memories is set against his discovery of that supposedly dead book. Just as nearly all the services to preserve his mother’s collection of keepsakes and memorabilia includes optimization whether he wants that service or not, the same is true with books. That’s how he makes his living, by turning dead books into “living” ones.

Meaning that all books are electronic and updated constantly according to formulas about what is popular, comfortable and desirable. Except that dead book he found in the library. It can’t be changed, or altered, or improved. It’s dead ink on dead paper.

But the story lives in his thoughts in a way that no “living book” ever has. He’s intrigued by both the story and the concept. He’s also frightened, very nearly but not quite completely out of his wits, that there’s someone following him and interfering with his digital access to EVERYTHING in order to coerce him to give up the book.

Fortunately for the protagonist, one of the things that his mother taught him, that he needs to remember, is how to get around the ubiquitous electronic surveillance and need for electronic access in order to get himself to the one place that might just take him – and his memories and his dead but still dangerous book – in.

Escape Rating A-: I was able to listen to this as a podcast, read by Kate Baker, and it did help to put me inside the main character’s head – even if said main character wasn’t always sure where his head was at and whether or not he was seeing things. Howsomever, this is a hard story to encapsulate – see above effort – because it’s hitting a lot of different and interesting themes in a relatively short space. Also, the unnamed protagonist just makes describing the story even more awkward.

The story that this reminded me of most turned out to be “The Boy from Elsewhen” by Barlow Crassmont, part of Writers of the Future 41. Both are stories about the value of the unchanging printed word versus the endless mutability of electronic documents although they take that concept in different directions. In the Crassmont story, it starts out as a quirk that is subject to mockery, but ends with a realization that having to deal with material that isn’t homogenized for the reader stimulates intelligence and creativity. In this story, that idea is taken a step further as the villain of the piece actively works to remove the book from circulation because they are afraid of what the thoughts it engenders might lead to.

There’s also a bit of Notes from a Regicide by Isaac Fellman as both are stories about sons trying to preserve the memories of their late parents through the preservation of the materials and artifacts they left behind.

The part of the story that was really difficult to include was the way that the whole society seems to have turned into a culture that preserves nothing and hangs onto very little. It seemed a bit like the result of the societal collapse in Down in the Sea of Angels, but we don’t know how they got there in this story so the characters who are coming from that perspective, the protagonist’s weird girlfriend Elii, feel false and weird.

At the same time, the plot elements, the story that he’s reading, the way it affects him and how much it feels to this reader as if the protagonist of the story is an avatar for the protagonist of the story he’s reading or vice versa, felt, well, real. We do see ourselves in stories, whether our actual selves or a person we might have been or might want to be. The equivocal, uncertain ending of the story within the story is exactly the kind of ending that opens the mind and makes the reader think because it IS disturbing and sometimes we need that even if we don’t want it.

While the mysterious figure chasing after the main character, the clearly dangerous but not-quite-exactly-human Caliper John, adds tension and a chilling sense of danger that moves the story forward even as it further enmeshes the story on the surface with the story inside it.

I have one more novelette to go in this year’s Hugo reading, unless I decide to reread Lake of Souls because it’s been a while. In any case, I’ll be back in a week or two with the next installment!

Grade A #BookReview: The Four Sisters Overlooking the Sea by Naomi Kritzer

Grade A #BookReview: The Four Sisters Overlooking the Sea by Naomi Kritzer“The Four Sisters Overlooking the Sea” by Naomi Kritzer in Asimov’s, September/October 2024) by Naomi Kritzer
Format: ebook
Source: supplied by publisher via Hugo Packet
Formats available: magazine
Genres: fantasy, historical fantasy, magical realism, short stories
Series: Asimov's Science Fiction September/October 2024
Pages: 23
Published by Asimov's Science Fiction on September 1, 2024
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazon
Goodreads

Asimov's Science Fiction Magazine, September-October 2024. Cover story: "Bachelorettes on the Devil’s Dance Floor" by Stephanie Feldman. Other stories in this issue:

“Heartshock” by Nick Wolven
"The Four Sisters Overlooking the Sea” by Naomi Kritzer
"In the Dark” by James Patrick Kelly
"And to Their Shining Palaces Go” by Betsy Aoki
"All the Homes of Terror” by Robert Reed
"Art Deco Farmhouse, Original Hardwood Floors, Slightly Haunted “ by Alice Towey
"An Unplanned Hold” by Zohar Jacobs
"Bitter Chai, Sweet Chai” by Anita Vijayakumar
"Lost Recall” by Robert R. Chase
"Eternity Is Moments” by R. P. Sand
"Project Fafnir” by Susan Shwartz
"A Gray Magic" by Ray Nayler
plus poetry by Mary Soon Lee, Jane Yolen and others

Features Editorial: Magnifique! by Sheila Williams; Reflections: The Man Who Saw the Future by Robert Silverberg; On the Net: The Music of the Future by James Patrick Kelly; Thought Experiment: Nuclear War, Satire, and the Grotesque in Dr. Strangelove by Kelly Lagor; On Books by Norman Spinrad

My Review:

Once upon a time, there were two Ph.D students who fell in love and got married. Then reality set in, a particular academic reality known as the ‘two-body problem’. They are two bodies, both in need of those oh-so-rare tenure track positions, but for both of them to advance in their careers they need to find a place that has jobs for both of them at the same time.

That her subject is marine and estuarine ecology, concentrated on seals (not sea lions, but seals) limits her further to coastal areas and the universities and research labs nearby. He studies watersheds and wetlands, he can probably work anywhere except the desert southwest – and maybe even there.

When we meet Morgan and Stuart fifteen years later, the situation has worked out JUST FINE for Stuart. He’s got a tenured position at the University of Minnesota – in the Twin Cities which is INLAND. He’s currently working at Harvard during his sabbatical, while living two hours away in coastal Finstowe, because that’s what his stipend could afford. But of course he’s pissed at Morgan because everything wrong in their personal lives is all her fault. No matter how much he has to twist the situation around to make it so. After all, it’s her job to keep his path smooth so he can be successful. Because she has no one to blame except herself that she’s not. Or does she?

His success has been earned by her labor. As both their careers were just starting out, her laptop and all of her meticulous research were both destroyed. Her backups were mysteriously lost in a move. The university’s backups coincidentally never happened. She got pregnant in spite of their precautions – or because of being an emotional wreck after the catastrophe.

Now she’s the unpaid, unsung, co-author of ALL the published work that has granted his tenure. She also does all of the physical and emotional labor of raising their daughter, maintaining their household and budget, and generally keeping his ship sailing unencumbered.

And she’s tired of every single bit of the scorn, spite, gaslighting and emotional abuse he heaps upon her at every single turn. Because she was ‘careless’ with her research.

Except that she wasn’t. While, as she finally discovers, he wasn’t nearly careful enough.

Escape Rating A: This was one of the Hugo Nominated Novelettes (say that three times really fast!) that I was most looking forward to this year. Because I adored “The Year Without Sunshine” out of last year’s nominees so very much. (Also, it WON and I was even more thrilled.)

So I expected great things from this year’s story, and I certainly got them. What I also got in this story – and did not expect at all, was that it would be a beautiful version of a recent book, The Sirens.

Not merely beautiful, but honestly BETTER. So much better. Instead of something bloated and meandering and filled with infinite rehashings of the same scene, this story is crisp and clear, tells just enough of the same sort of history to make it properly poignant AND delivers some much deserved comeuppance to all the right parties.

And it tells a glorious story of found sisterhood with just the right number of secrets held just the right length of time and over the right space of story, with the right kind of evil getting its just desserts without muddying the waters of who is who and what is what and when is when.

I did figure out the big secret in the story because that part, the part of the story entirely too grounded in real life, has been told before. Howsomever the comeuppance was so righteously delivered in this one that I loved every single minute of it. But I don’t wish there were more because this story was exactly the right length and only the deserving lived happily ever after.

Yes, I’m squeeing, and I’m squeeing a LOT. I think my only complaint about this story is that there’s no podcast – or at least there isn’t one yet. Uncanny Magazine and Clarkesworld seem to podcast ALL their stories, it looks like Lightspeed podcasts about half, but Asimov’s is more selective about it. I wouldn’t be surprised if this story doesn’t get added to Asimov’s archive of podcasts BECAUSE of the Hugo nomination, but it isn’t there now, I couldn’t wait, and I’m glad I didn’t.

Although I loved this one so much that if Asimov’s does produce a podcast I’d be happy to experience it all over again.

#AudioBookReview: Signs of Life by Sarah Pinsker

#AudioBookReview: Signs of Life by Sarah Pinsker"Signs of Life" by Sarah Pinsker in Uncanny Magazine Issue 59: July/August 2024 by Sarah Pinsker
Narrator: Erika Ensign
Format: ebook, podcast
Source: podcast, supplied by publisher via Hugo Packet
Formats available: magazine, podcast
Genres: magical realism, short stories
Series: Uncanny Magazine Issue 58
Pages: 35
Length: 1 hour
Published by Uncanny Magazine on July 2, 2024
Purchasing Info: Author's WebsitePublisher's WebsiteAmazonBarnes & NobleKobo
Goodreads

The July/August 2024 issue of Hugo Award-winning Uncanny Magazine.

Featuring new fiction by Sarah Pinsker, Greg van Eekhout, Sunwoo Jeong, John Chu, AnaMaria Curtis, Eleanna Castroianni, and Megan Chee. Essays by John Scalzi, Marissa Lingen, Del Sandeen, and Natania Barron, poetry by Terese Mason Pierre, Natasha King, Roshani Chokshi, and Abdulkareem Abdulkareem, interviews with Greg van Eekhout and AnaMaria Curtis by Caroline M. Yoachim, a cover by Broci, and an editorial by Lynne M. Thomas and Michael Damian Thomas.

Uncanny Magazine is a bimonthly science fiction and fantasy magazine first published in November 2014. Edited by 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2023 Hugo award winners for best semiprozine, and 2018 Hugo award winners for Best Editor, Short Form, Lynne M. Thomas and Michael Damian Thomas, and Monte Lin, each issue of Uncanny includes new stories, poetry, articles, and interviews.

My Review:

I’m attempting to be a bit – just a bit – more deliberate in my Hugo reading this year, so I’ll be reviewing all of the Best Novelette nominees before moving on to the Best Short Story nominees. With one exception for Lake of Souls by Ann Leckie because I reviewed that year for Library Journal as one of the two not previously published stories in the author’s collection of the same title.

The story here in “Signs of Life” is more speculative fiction than either SF or fantasy – and I spent most of my listen/read of it wondering exactly when the spec fic element was going to come in, because if I hadn’t known there had to be one for most of the story I wouldn’t have guessed that a specifically speculative element was coming.

For most of its length, this is a story about sisters reconnecting after spending their entire adult lives on the outs with each other. The story is told from the perspective of Veronica, the sister who left – although she’s not the most reliable narrator.

Not because she lies to the reader, but because her desire to heal the rift with her sister Violet after FOUR DECADES of estrangement is at war with her need not to touch that third rail in her head about how it came about in the first place. As Veronica looks back, the cause of their rift is unforgivable and all her own fault. A fault she feels the need to apologize for before that rift can be healed.

And she doesn’t really want to bring it up, out of fear that raising those old ghosts will widen the rift instead of being a prelude to healing it.

It turns out that this story – as much as it’s about two sisters reconnecting after a lifetime of being apart – isn’t so much about the rift or even the sisters as it is about LONELINESS and their very different responses to it. And that’s where the speculative aspects of the story come in.

It’s a huge spoiler and more than a bit of a wow at the end. I’ll leave it for you to discover just how much of a wow that wow is for yourself.

Escape Rating B: For about half of the length of this story, I was wondering when it was going to get to the point. Or at least to the point of what made it eligible for the Hugos in the first place. It’s kind of appropriate that this story appeared in Uncanny Magazine, because that’s the right word for it, uncanny.

If I had to assign a genre to it – and I sorta/kinda do – I’d call this one “magical realism”. Except the words should be switched around, because it’s very much grounded in the real until that halfway point when we start to get hints of the magic behind it all.

At that halfway point I did get a pretty big hint about what the magical part of the story was – I just didn’t think that element went nearly as far as it turned out that it did.

I started this one from the podcast, as I do whenever possible with short works like this one. The reading by Erika Ensign was well done, and she did a particularly good job of letting the listener into Veronica’s head. I always love a good first-person perspective in audio when the narrator’s voice is a good match for the head they are in, and this one was. The reader made it easy to feel all of Veronica’s very mixed emotions along with the mental ellipses where her reminiscences took her places that she just didn’t want to go.

In the end, I had a surprisingly similar reaction to “Signs of Life” that I did to this author’s 2024 nominated novelette, “One Man’s Treasure”, but like the reference to “magical realism” above, just a bit backwards. In that previous story, I LOVED the story but didn’t think it stuck the dismount. It didn’t feel like the story got the closure it needed.

This time around, the ending was a WOW of a close. It ended with a bang and it was just the right bang. It did a pretty good job of making the story that led up to it worth the read. At the same time, I was really glad this was a short work, because the first half meandered in a whole lot of places that just didn’t feel speculative or magical at all. A longer story would have meant more of that meandering and that’s not what I was looking for.

I’m planning to review one story a week, mostly, so I’ll be back next week with the story I’m most looking forward to even if there isn’t a podcast. It’s “The Four Sisters Overlooking the Sea” by last year’s Best Novelette WINNER, Naomi Kritzer.