“Why Don't We Just Kill the Kid in the Omelas Hole” by Isabel J. Kim in Clarkesworld, Issue 209, February 2024 by Isabel J. Kim Narrator: Kate Baker
Format: ebook, podcast
Source: podcast, supplied by publisher via Hugo Packet
Formats available: magazine, podcast
Genres: dystopian, science fiction, short stories
Series: Clarkesworld Magazine Issue 209 February 2024
Pages: 10
Length: 22 minutes
Published by Clarkesworld Magazine on February 10, 2024
Purchasing Info: Author's Website, Publisher's Website, Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Kobo
Goodreads
Clarkesworld is a Hugo and World Fantasy Award-winning science fiction and fantasy magazine. Each month we bring you a mix of fiction, articles, interviews and art. Our February 2024 issue (#209) contains:
Original fiction by H.H. Pak ("Scalp"), Rajeev Prasad ("The Flowers That We Intend To Share"), Zohar Jacobs ("The Enceladus South Pole Base Named after V.I. Lenin"), David Goodman ("Kardashev''s Palimpsest"), Yang Wanqing ("The Peregrine Falcon Flies West"), Isabel J. Kim ("Why Don''t We Just Kill the Kid In the Omelas Hole"), Ryan Marie Ketterer ("The Beam Eidolon"), and Meghan Feldman ("Lonely Ghosts").
Non-fiction includes an article by Ben Lockwood, interviews with Wole Talabi and Bogi Takacs, and an editorial by Neil Clarke.
My Review:
Once upon a time – back in 1973 – Ursula K. Le Guin published a short story that exists on an uncomfortable border between science fiction and philosophy titled “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas.” It’s one of those stories that rips you to pieces on first reading and keeps swirling around in your head well after you’ve read it.
Which I never did. Not back in the day, not in the intervening years since. At least not until I set out to read THIS short story and learned that “Why Don’t We Just Kill the Kid in the Omelas Hole” is in dialogue with Le Guin’s original story. Or it’s in dialogue with all of the commentary about the original story and all of the other stories that have been written in dialogue with the original story.
The reading jury is still out on that last bit but I knew I needed the foundational story to get why it’s still being written about and towards and against more than fifty years later.
(If you want to listen as well, there’s an audio collection of Le Guin’s short stories titled The Unreal and the Real available through Kindle Unlimited. That’s how I finally read – or had read to me – the original story. And it’s still a hell of a story fifty years later. There’s a reason Le Guin became a Grand Master of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America, among many, many other awards.)
What makes this story so searing is that it’s a ‘greater good’ story where “the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or of the one” that explores just how problematic and even false those beliefs are when the one has no choice in the matter.
The problem with both of those philosophies, the way that they can and often do so horribly wrong, is rooted in the problem of ‘who decides?”.
SpockView Post’s sacrifice in The Wrath of Khan was both noble and heartbreaking because he made the decision. He CHOSE to sacrifice his life to save the crew of the Enterprise. If someone had shoved him into that chamber and forced him to fix the reactor at the cost of his own life, it becomes something else altogether.
That second version is the story in the original “Omelas” story. That the Omelas can have a beautiful utopia if they are willing to neglect, abuse and torture a child in order to ensure it. The story was searing enough in 1973, but this story, written in a much more cynical 2024, strips away the fig leaf of whether or not the child’s unwilling, unwitting sacrifice actually achieves the goal – or whether the child is merely a scapegoat and sin eater for the Omelas’ very real human behaviors and failures.
Because humans are gonna human, and they certainly do in this story, and their behavior is even more horrific than any of them want to think about, let alone believe.
Escape Rating A: What makes this story work, so many decades after the original, is the way that it grounds the Omelas in the here and now as it strips the mask of the Omelas themselves bare.
In the original story, the Omelas and their city are a thought experiment. We don’t know where or when they are, just that their behavior is reprehensible and that they feel justified because it’s for ‘the greater good’.
This story sets the city of the Omelas in the here and now, in a world where everyone knows about the Omelas, the internet is watching and commenting on the Omelas, and the people who rise up against the Omelas’ treatment of the “load-bearing, suffering child” are determined to stop the practice because whatever is going on isn’t achieving anything except suffering.
Even as the internet, and the world at large, watch and comment and invent conspiracy theories while being gleeful that the awful Omelas are not themselves – even though from a certain perspective, they absolutely are.
I may have made a mistake in finishing this story right before going to bed, but I’m glad that it was the final story in my Hugo Readalong. Clearly, between this story and “We Will Teach You How to Read | We Will Teach You How to Read”, I saved the best for last.
It also made this story – as well as Le Guin’s original story – more affecting in audio than they would have been in text. Particularly this contemporary written story, as there was a wry archness to Kate Baker’s reading that was perfect for this story. I could hear the inflections and the eye rolls, and it made the story just that much better.
And this completes my personal Hugo nominee read along. The stories were mostly good to great, and I had a great time reading and/or listening to them. THIS STORY recently won the Nebula for Best Short Story. We’ll see if it wins the Hugo as well when the winners are announced this coming Saturday, August 16, at the Seattle WorldCon. I can’t wait to find out who won!
“We Will Teach You How to Read | We Will Teach You How to Read” by Caroline M. Yoachim in Lightspeed Magazine Issue 168 May 2024 by
“Five Views of the Planet Tartarus” by Rachael K Jones in Lightspeed Magazine Issue 164 January 2024 by
"Three Faces of a Beheading" by Arkady Martine in Uncanny Magazine, Issue 58, May/June 2024 by
Although I had expectations of the author as I fell hard for
I did sorta/kinda pick up that the intent of the story was to show – not tell but SHOW – how difficult it is for creators to create and expose their creations in the midst of a crisis and/or a repressive regime or both. It’s about just how rebellious and revolutionary an act it can be to speak your truth when your truth is considered subversive.
“Stitched to Skin Like Family Is” by Nghi Vo in Uncanny Magazine, Issue 57, March/April 2024 by
So it is not a surprise that this story did remind me, at least a bit, of
“Marginalia” by Mary Robinette Kowal in Uncanny Magazine, Issue 56, January/February 2024 by
This entry in my Hugo Award nominee readings moves the dial from the novelettes to the short stories. I picked this one to go first in that category because the author is one that I’ve certainly enjoyed in longer forms, notably her
Escape Rating C: “Marginalia” feels like a story that’s a bit of a filler. Putting it another way, the story lives up to, or more appropriately down to, its title, as marginalia are, according to Wikipedia, “marks made in the margins of a book or other document.” The bits around the outside edges of something else. Whether that something else was a bigger story, or in this case whether that something else should have been pitched at a younger audience, either way this story is fun enough for its length – or its length in audio, but no more than that.
“Loneliness Universe” by Eugenia Triantafyllou in Uncanny Magazine, Issue 58, May/June 2024 by
There’s a
“The Brotherhood of Montague St. Video” by Thomas Ha in Clarkesworld, Issue 212, May 2024 by
The story that this reminded me of most turned out to be “The Boy from Elsewhen” by Barlow Crassmont, part of
“The Four Sisters Overlooking the Sea” by Naomi Kritzer in Asimov’s, September/October 2024) by
Escape Rating A: This was one of the Hugo Nominated Novelettes (say that three times really fast!) that I was most looking forward to this year. Because I adored
"Signs of Life" by Sarah Pinsker in Uncanny Magazine Issue 59: July/August 2024 by