"When He Calls Your Name" by Catherynne M. Valente in Uncanny Magazine, Issue 65, July/August 2025 by Catherynne M. Valente Format: ebook
Source: supplied by publisher via Hugo Packet
Formats available: magazine
Genres: fantasy, horror, paranormal, short stories
Series: Uncanny Magazine Issue 65 July/August 2025
Pages: 35
Published by Uncanny Magazine on July 1, 2025
Purchasing Info: Author's Website, Publisher's Website, Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Kobo
Goodreads
The July/August 2025 issue of Hugo Award-winning Uncanny Magazine.
Featuring all-new short fiction by John Chu, Catherynne M. Valente, Shveta Thakrar, Emma Törzs, Daniel H. Wilson, Jordan Taylor, and A. W. Prihandita; essays by J. R. Dawson, Brandon O’Brien, Charlie Jane Anders, and Amanda Wakaruk and Olav Rokne; poetry by Lora Gray, Shankar Narayan, Avra Margariti, and Prosper C. Ìféányí; interviews with Catherynne M. Valente and Daniel H. Wilson by Caroline M. Yoachim; Nilah Magruder’s The Duet as the cover; and an editorial by Michael Damian Thomas.
My Review:
At the same time, and in the same thought, if you’ve never heard, or heard of the Eldritch Horror version of “Jolene” , you REALLY don’t want to look that up until after you’ve finished the story. Because this story fits WAY BETTER into the Eldritch Horror version than it does the original.
The outline of the story is the same as the song. It’s the same as a lot of songs, actually. “Jolene” strolls into this small town, “steals” the narrator’s husband and comes to claim her “prize”. The scare quotes are because a person can’t be stolen in the way these stories usually mean, and frankly, Charlie is no prize for either of them.
The story is theoretically about a conversation between the narrator, the “wronged” wife, and the brazen, man-stealing hussy Jolene.
It’s in the word “theoretically” that all the paranormal elements AND interesting speculation come into this story – on both sides.
Some of that is in the circumlocution that the narrator uses to refer to Jolene. At first, we’re pretty sure that the word she’s talking around but not actually saying is ‘whore’. Or possibly either ‘bitch’ or ‘cunt’ or all of the above. It’s only as the story progresses, as they talk on the porch, that the reader realizes that the word that’s being talked around is actually ‘vampire’.
And that the reason they’re having this conversation on the porch is that porches are liminal spaces, neither inside or outside, and that the distinction is important to creatures like Jolene. And, as it turns out, to people like the narrator. Maybe. Possibly. Eventually.
Because Jolene can’t get into the house to get Charlie without permission. Permission that the narrator is not about to give. Ever. At the same time, Jolene doesn’t need permission to get inside the narrator’s head. All she needs is time to talk and a whole lot of experience in getting people to question themselves and everything they thought they knew.
Escape Rating B: This is the last novelette in my Hugo reads. And it’s a very sort of equivocal story to end with. It’s not exactly fantasy, it’s not exactly horror, it’s not exactly the song and it’s not exactly like the story the reader thinks it’s going to be at any point in it. It also doesn’t exactly end. Jolene goes, the narrator stays and Charlie wakes up from his ensorcellment but it doesn’t feel like an ending. Or so I thought on first reading
It felt more like a temporary settling on the original status quo, and a pause while the narrator thinks about whether she’s going to remain content with the small life in the small town with the mostly tolerable husband she mostly keeps afloat through life. Then I reread the beginning and realized it wasn’t.
Either way, the real story doesn’t feel like it’s Jolene stealing Charlie or stealing Charlie’s soul or stealing Charlie’s life essence. It’s about the story she tells that night, a very unreliable narrator explaining how she got to be what she is and that it doesn’t work the way that people think it does. And that the narrator is just as likely to turn out like Jolene someday as Jolene was likely to have been her if her life had been different or if she’d been willing to settle for what other people thought she should be.
From one perspective, this is a feminist take on the story in the song. Jolene didn’t choose to become a vampire, she chose not to settle for the life that society believed she was supposed to have. This is absolutely not a ‘wronged woman’ vs. ‘brazen hussy’ story that pits two women against each other over a man who isn’t worth it. Jolene is just surviving and the narrator is just protecting the life she’s built. In the end, they aren’t enemies, they’re merely two sides of the same coin.
I thought the story was left a bit open-ended, that the narrator had decided one thing in the moment but might – and could – change her mind at some point in the future. The author contacted me to tell me to check the opening line again, and she was right to. Because the opening line does give the ending, but only after you read the whole thing through. Something that’s easy to lose track of in the throes of a good story. Which I did.
In the end, I left this one with mixed feelings. It held my interest while reading, and Jolene’s interpretations of the hows and whys of her kind of vampirism were interesting and a bit different, which was itself good because damn but that’s been done to death – pun definitely intended.
However, the story needs a lot of underlying assumptions about the narrator’s life and choices to make it work. (Also, in the original song she’s so pathetic that I can’t even with that.) A little bit more story, novella length perhaps, would have allowed more room for worldbuilding and a bit less of the song lyrics, resulting in a killer earworm. Your reading mileage may vary.
But now that I’ve finished my reading in this category, I’m left on the horns of a bit of a dilemma in my Hugo ballot. Not about this story, which is going to be well down my ballot, but needing to flip a coin between “Kaiju Agonistes” and “Never Eaten Vegetables” for my top pick. I have less than two weeks left to decide!
The Three Coffin Problem by
I read the first of this series of these Judge Dee stories a couple of years ago
“The Mystery of the Missing Manuscript” c2022 Reactor
“The Executioner of Epinal” c2024 Reactor
“The Poisoner of Montmartre” c2021 Reactor
“Seven Vampires” c2022 Reactor
For Better or Murder (A Holy Terrors Mystery, 4) by
It feels like this latest book in the
Of course, the place is haunted. Or so the proprietors claim. Of course the atmosphere is beyond spooky and Mother Nature seems determined to whip the dramatic pauses and power failures up to eleven. Of course, the wedding party is a motley crew filled with hidden agendas and open resentments.
Ishmael Jones series actually works a little better because there’s an SFnal element in Ishmael’s background that allows some of the ends to be supernatural or extra-terrestrial and have that work. OTOH, Ishmael and Penny can’t really reach a happy ending – for other factors in Ishmael’s origin – but Alistair and Diana can. And quite possibly do at the end of THIS book.
Lightning Runes (City of Shadows, 2) by
Escape Rating B: The cover of Lightning Runes sums up my mixed feelings a whole lot better than I ever expected. First, vampire Dora Urban wouldn’t be caught alive, unalive or dead in that dress or with that ridiculous expression on her face. Even after centuries – or more – as a vampire she’s still too much of an aristocrat for either. Meanwhile, there’s something wrong, like uncanny valley wrong or human bodies don’t quite work that way wrong, with the man standing in for Jack Mitchell. The story was like that too for me, a sense of ‘almost but not quite’ right – or at least not quite as good as the first book.
The Shop on Hidden Lane by
The little shop on Hidden Lane in tiny Mirror Lake looks like a bit of a tourist trap for those who believe in the weird reputation of the town and the surrounding area. And it kind of is, but that’s not the business that keeps the lights on. Bea Harper makes her reputation performing paranormal investigations for the people who KNOW that it’s all real because they’re part of it.
But Bea Harper is missing, and so is Deke Wells, her romantic partner/frenemy – it’s complicated. Bea’s niece Sophy and Deke’s nephew Luke were surprised by the discovery of that relationship because the Harpers and the Wells have been feuding since the previous century.
The author has already dreamed that future, as this is part of long-running, multi-faceted, sometimes multifarious series that began – historically – with the Victorian Era set
The idea that the government conducted secret experiments and then tried to cover everything up isn’t all that fictional. These particular experiments into the paranormal (most likely) are, but history tells us this sort of thing did happen, particularly in regard to the Manhattan Project in WW2 and the production of nuclear power afterwards. (If you want a REAL chill, read
I loved that Bea and Deke found THEIR HEA even though we don’t see their romance. The amount of time they’ve been (secretly) involved also helps to balance out the instalove between their respective niblings, Sophy and Luke, which happens so fast and furiously hot that even the participants acknowledge it’s awfully fast although they are both deeply committed by the end of this FOUR DAY adrenaline race.
Turns of Fate (Isle of Wyrd, #1) by 
Ushers by
The case felt like something straight out of the
The Late-Night Witches by
The idea was a good one – which isn’t really a surprise because it’s been done before – and better. If you loved any of the following:
Which Witch? (Holy Terrors Mystery, #3) by
There’s a curse on ‘The Scottish Play’, or so the old acting tradition goes. Part of that curse is that if any of the actors in the play utter the play’s actual title, that the production will be doomed. It’s possible that tradition arose because
Twice as Dead (City of Shadows #1) by 
